Beth Gutelius and Nik Theodore
October 22, 2019
Are “dark” warehouses, humming along without humans, just around the corner? Predictions of dramatic job loss due to technology adoption and automation often highlight warehousing as an industry on the brink of transformation. The potential elimination of many blue-collar jobs is a pressing issue for policy makers and raises important questions about how workers will fare in the economy of the future.
In contrast to reports focusing only on the number of jobs that could be lost, our research offers an in-depth, detailed look at the range of ways in which warehouse work and the industry as a whole might change with the adoption of new technology over the next five to 10 years. The findings in this report are based on in-depth industry research and extensive interviews with a broad set of stakeholders, including industry analysts and consultants, third-party logistics (3PL) operators, retailers, brands, and technology providers. Specifically, we sought to find out:
Many accounts of technological change portray firm decision making as purely based on a desire to automate to reduce labor costs. While labor cost reduction plays an important role, our research found a multifaceted set of factors shaping firms’ decisions about how to apply new technologies in warehouses. One set of trends—tight labor markets, rising real estate costs, and increasing speed requirements—are pushing warehouse operators to explore new technologies.
On the other hand, variability and unpredictability, outsourcing dynamics, inertia, and the state of technological innovation are factors that may slow the process of technology uptake.
As a result, we project that the industry likely won’t experience dramatic job loss over the next decade, though many workers may see the content and quality of their jobs shift as technologies are adopted for particular tasks. Employers may use technology in ways that decrease the skill requirements of jobs in order to reduce training times and turnover costs. This could create adverse effects on workers, such as wage stagnation and job insecurity. New technologies potentially can curtail monotonous or physically strenuous activities, but depending on how they are implemented, may present new challenges for worker health and safety, employee morale, and turnover. Additionally, electronically mediated forms of monitoring and micro-management threaten to constrain workers’ autonomy and introduce new rigidities into the workplace.
These changes will have a greater impact on communities with high concentrations of warehouse workers. Warehouses typically are clustered near major transportation arteries and population centers—for example, the Inland Empire in California and the Chicago region. Two-thirds of front-line warehouse workers are people of color, most of them Black or Latinx, who stand to be disproportionately affected by technological change. Women are more likely to work in the growing e-commerce sector than in traditional warehouses, so they may benefit from growing employment opportunities, but also face lower wages and increasing pressure from changes in working conditions.
1. The warehousing industry is characterized by slim profit margins and cost-sensitive competition, which leads to a cautious approach to technology adoption.
Viewed mainly as a cost center, warehousing is a low-margin industry with high levels of volatility and risk. Cost-based, risk-averse competitive dynamics lead warehouse operators to reduce exposure to cost wherever possible. This is one main reason the industry has lagged in its adoption of new technologies.
Broadly speaking, warehouse operators have thus far moved cautiously into risky experiments with new technologies, relying instead on streamlining current processes and on workforce experimentation. Our research suggests that this trend will continue—the cost sensitivity of the dominant business model will moderate the rate of technological experimentation and uptake, though larger firms may be able to leverage volume and a strong financial position to adopt new technologies. Absent a major shift in how warehousing activities are valued, the dynamics that have created barriers to innovation and contributed to the sector’s status as a laggard are likely to persist over the next five to 10 years.
2. E-commerce is driving experimentation with new technologies.
With double-digit sales growth each year, few shifts in consumption patterns have had a greater impact on the warehousing industry than the rise of e-commerce. Online shopping is leading the transformation of the warehousing industry and is poised to have substantial effects on jobs and workers, not least in the realm of adoption of new technologies. E-commerce order picking requires more labor and, given the prompt delivery expectations of consumers, the order fulfillment process is accelerated. This results in a growing need for workers in warehouses, and an increasing interest in technologies that can streamline work processes and improve efficiencies.
Additionally, Amazon’s influence in the online retail arena is substantial, particularly in the context of the company’s announcements of increasingly faster delivery promises. Whereas a few years ago, consumers were content for an order to arrive in a few days, the delivery window has steadily narrowed with the growing prevalence of Amazon’s Prime subscription. The combination of labor-intensive order picking and the speed with which these orders must be shipped has made e-commerce a leading driver of growth in warehousing employment, and is motivating experimentation with new technologies to support the order fulfillment process. This includes technologies that de-skill or potentially displace workers, such as automated picking processes, as well as technologies that speed up, control, or streamline human labor, such as electronic productivity monitoring.
3. Technology uptake likely will be uneven.
Across firms, within firms, and across technologies, adoption likely will vary significantly. Our research confirmed that warehouses are in disparate stages of their techno-strategy development, and that most firms are cautiously exploring new innovations. The business profile of a company, including the specific activities occurring in warehouse facilities, amount of goods being moved, and product markets, all help determine the propensity for technology adoption.
Within firms, a broad set of tasks and activities potentially could be high priority for applications of new technology and automation. Firms must make choices about which activities take precedence, leading to a variegated landscape of technological sophistication across activities in a warehouse. Our research documented that even firms at or near the leading edge of innovation in one area often lag behind in other areas. In one example, a large parcel company had made significant investments in a high-throughput conveyor and automated radio frequency barcode scanning system, but managers still were using spreadsheets and a whiteboard to schedule workers to handle package volumes. Another indication of unevenness is in the market penetration of warehouse management systems (WMS)—a common type of software used in the industry. Using a WMS is a fundamental building block for the adoption of many other technologies, and yet it is estimated that at least one-third of warehouses in the United States do not use such a system.
We project there will continue to be uneven uptake across technologies, in large part because the new technologies tend to be specialized to particular warehouse activities. The modularity of some new technologies, as well as alternative models of leasing, changes the capital investment and risk assessment scenarios in ways that could facilitate firms’ technology experimentation and uptake.
4. Technology potentially will have large impacts on third-party logistics firms and outsourcing in the warehousing industry.
Outsourcing is a significant trend in the warehousing sector that affects the pace and forms of technology adoption. New technologies also have the potential to change firms’ behavior with respect to outsourcing, which typically takes two forms: (1) outsourcing warehouse management and operations to third-party logistics firms (3PLs), which offer a wide range of logistics-related services, and (2) outsourcing of warehouse hiring to temporary staffing agencies.
3PLs and temporary staffing agencies are navigating an uncertain landscape of strategies. Some are exploring new roles that leverage technology, while others appear to be taking a wait-and-see approach without significantly altering their value propositions. One 3PL company, for example, coped with a tenfold increase in holiday shopping volume by switching its facility to a highly manual process during peak season and hiring hundreds of extra workers, because the conveyor system could not accommodate the influx of orders. Other warehouse operators reported exploring the use of on-demand staffing platforms, which could simplify hiring processes for the benefit of employers and workers. However, using such tools also may encourage employers to reduce the number of direct hires and increase reliance on temporary workers, who tend to be paid less and have fewer protections on the job.
Also, 3PL contracts often are short (three to five years), which makes a return on investment difficult to achieve for warehouse operators taking on major investments in new technology. Many 3PLs have avoided such investments because of the possibility of losing the customer at the end of a contract, thus eliminating any potential gains. Despite these disincentives, some large 3PLs like DHL and XPO are piloting technologies to better meet the needs of their customers.
Similarly, the president of a mid-sized 3PL said his company was exploring how it might commingle smaller e-commerce startups in a single facility and implement automation across all of them in order to speed up order fulfillment.
1. New technologies are likely to lead to work intensification.
The highest priority for companies in the short term is to identify and implement technologies that support more efficient order fulfillment. This includes applying labor-saving technologies to high-volume e-commerce order picking and frequent, small-batch replenishments to retail stores that keep limited inventory on hand. The labor-intensive nature of picking individual items to assemble orders—so-called “each picking”—requires large numbers of workers, so warehouse operators place great value on finding ways to reduce headcount and/or increase throughput by reorganizing this activity.
Our research suggests that even though some technologies could alleviate the most arduous tasks of warehouse work (such as heavy lifting), this likely will be coupled with attempts to increase the workload and pace of work, with new methods of monitoring workers. Amazon, for example, introduced MissionRacer, a video game that pits workers against one another to assemble customer orders fastest.
The increasing pace of work in warehouses may introduce new health and safety hazards, as well as increased employee turnover due to overwork and burnout. Currently, warehouse workers experience work-related injuries at a rate nearly twice that of other private industry workers— higher than construction, coal mining, and most manufacturing industries. According to The New York Times, pregnant workers at a warehouse in Memphis managed by the 3PL XPO were denied requests for light duty and subsequently suffered miscarriages. Warehouse employees also often toil in facilities that are not climate controlled, which exacerbates the hazards created by work speed-up.
2. New technologies have the potential to de-skill some jobs.
Some warehouse technologies are designed to simplify aspects of warehouse work by breaking a job into subtasks and, where possible, removing the skills required of the workforce. Across all occupations in warehouses, viable technologies are likely to replace some human-performed decision-making tasks with machines, significantly changing the composition and quality of jobs. In some cases, the de-skilling appears to be motivated by a desire to shift labor strategy, including expanding the size of the potential labor market, increasing the use of temporary workers, reducing the workforce in certain occupations, and enhancing worker productivity.
Training workers to perform higher-skilled tasks is one potential avenue for adaptation to technological change, but this strategy appears to be underutilized in warehousing. Instead, labor reallocation likely will dominate in the short and medium term, supported by processes of de-skilling and work intensification. For example, the Kiva robotic picking system simplifies the role of humans in picking, reducing training and skill requirements, and making it easier for companies to hire temporary labor rather than direct employees.
3. New technologies are poised to transform how workers are managed.
Algorithmic management introduces new forms of workplace control, where the technological regulation of workers’ performance is granular, scalable, and relentless. Newly available devices
—such as “wearable” warehouse technologies, autonomous mobile robots, and increasingly sophisticated labor management software—allow close tracking of workers’ movements, including walk speed, routes, bottlenecks, and break time.
These technologies have the potential to improve efficiency by urging workers to increase speed and accuracy. These same technologies also can function as a form of surveillance over workers, reducing the little autonomy they already have and further intensifying the pace of their work.
Without interventions to ensure the transparency and fairness of the algorithms used in these technologies, the conditions of work in warehouses may be heading toward more rigid forms of monitoring and management.
4. In the short to medium term, new technologies likely will not cause widespread job loss.
With continued growth in demand, aggregate employment levels in the warehousing industry will likely continue to rise over the next five to 10 years. That said, job growth may be tempered by the increased use of labor-saving technologies in e-commerce warehouses in particular, such as autonomous mobile robots, autobaggers and autoboxers, and sensors or RFID tags applied to goods. Honeywell, for example, has developed robotic unloading machines that reduce the offloading time and concomitantly the role of workers in the process.
Many workers may see the nature of their working conditions shift as technologies are adopted for particular tasks over the next five to 10 years. Over the long term, in the absence of major shifts in the economy or context of firms’ technological adoption strategies, the increasing use of technology points to a labor reduction.
5. Technology is likely to have uneven impacts across demographics and occupations.
Because of the overrepresentation of workers who are young, male, Latinx and Black in the warehousing industry, these groups of workers will be affected disproportionately by technological change. In particular, Latinx and Black workers are overrepresented in the industry compared with the total U.S. workforce: both groups are employed in warehousing at twice the rate of all other industries. Latinx workers alone compose the largest single race/ethnic group in front-line warehousing jobs, at 35%. Black workers make up one-quarter of the workforce in both warehousing and e-commerce. Overall, workers of color constitute 66% of warehousing industry workers and 55% of workers in e-commerce, even though workers of color account for just 37% of the total U.S. labor force.
Other groups also will experience specific consequences from technological change in warehouses. Some technologies will disproportionately impact the employability of older workers, such as engineered productivity standards that penalize workers for not reaching exacting targets, or newer forms of technology for which older workers do not have training or experience. Women are more likely to be employed in e-commerce warehouses versus traditional warehouses, so the growth in e-commerce offers new employment opportunities for female workers. However, jobs in e-commerce warehouses typically have lower wages and less predictable schedules, and they are even more vulnerable to pressure to increase speed.
Finally, technological change will have different effects at the occupational level. Front-line occupations such as order pickers will likely see the content and quality of their jobs change with the application of new technologies that reduce low-value activities like walking and such automatable tasks as boxing orders. Forklift drivers may work alongside partially automated forklifts, and shipping clerks might see their work increasingly replaced by artificial intelligence.
Our findings raise a number of questions for policy makers, worker organizations, and industry
leaders in the warehousing sector:
In short, how the gains from technological change will be distributed is a pressing question for all of the industry’s stakeholders. While large retailers may be able to leverage their sizeable order volumes and strong financial positions to secure first-mover advantages through early adoption of new technologies, many 3PLs and smaller firms will face challenges, primarily the cost-based competition that is prevalent in the warehousing industry. Consequently, widespread automation of the warehousing industry is unlikely in the near to medium term. Experimentation with a variety of new technologies—including but not limited to those that may de-skill and intensify work—appears to be led by the widespread desire to compete with Amazon and other major online retailers.
Technologies are neither inherently good nor bad, just as the effects on employment are not inevitable. Ultimately, warehouse operators have latitude in determining how new technologies will be implemented. For example, when the wholesale retailer Boxed introduced cutting-edge automated processes into its warehouses, it retrained existing workers to fill new roles around these processes instead of laying them off.
The warehousing industry could realize significant operational improvements through technological advances—and it is imperative that productivity gains be shared, that workers be involved in identifying which efficiencies should be prioritized and what hazards are being introduced, and that experimentation unfolds with regard for more than just productivity increases and cost-cutting. Absent this, the process of technological change in warehousing likely will resemble a win-lose proposition, where the short-term benefits are captured by the industry and the long-run costs are borne by workers.
2 回答
GPT3翻译：
贝丝·古特柳斯和尼克·西奥多尔 2019年10月22日 无人化的“黑暗”仓库是否即将问世？由于技术采纳和自动化，物流仓储业的岗位大量减少的预测常被视为行业变革的边缘。许多蓝领岗位的潜在消失已经成为政策制定者关注的问题，并引发了关于未来经济中工人状况的重要讨论。 与仅关注可能失去的工作岗位数量的报告相比，我们的研究深入探讨了仓库工作和整个行业在未来五到十年采用新技术后可能发生的变化。本报告的研究结果基于深入的行业研究和广泛的与利益相关者的访谈，包括行业分析师和顾问、第三方物流（3PL）运营商、零售商、品牌和技术提供商。具体而言，我们试图找出： 哪些关键的行业动态正在推动技术变革？ 新技术的采用将如何影响仓库设施和运营，以及整个行业的组织？ 哪些任务和流程是技术应用的最高优先级，新技术的采用将如何影响仓储岗位？ 许多关于技术变革的报道将企业决策描绘为纯粹基于减少劳动成本的自动化愿望。虽然降低劳动成本发挥了重要作用，但我们的研究发现，多方面因素影响着企业在仓库中应用新技术的决策。其中一组趋势——劳动力市场紧张、房地产成本上升以及速度要求不断提高——推动仓库运营商探索新技术。 另一方面，可变性和不可预测性、外包动态、惯性以及技术创新的状况可能会减缓技术应用的进程。 因此，我们预测未来十年内行业不太可能出现大量岗位减少，尽管许多工人可能会在技术应用于特定任务时看到他们的工作内容和质量发生变化。雇主可能会以降低工作技能要求的方式使用技术，以减少培训时间和人员流失成本。这可能会对工人产生负面影响，如工资停滞和工作不稳定。新技术可能减轻单调或体力劳动，但根据实施方式的不同，可能给工人健康和安全、员工士气和人员流失带来新的挑战。此外，电子化的监控和微观管理形式可能会限制工人的自主权，并在工作场所引入新的僵化规定。 这些变化对于仓库工人集中度较高的社区影响较大。仓库通常集中在主要交通干线和人口中心附近，例如加州的内陆帝国和芝加哥地区。三分之二的一线仓库工人是有色人种，其中大多数是黑人或拉丁裔，他们可能会受到技术变革的不成比例的影响。相较于传统仓库，妇女更有可能在不断增长的电子商务部门工作，因此她们可能受益于不断增长的就业机会，但同时也面临着更低的工资和工作条件变化带来的压力。 研究发现 技术应对不断变化的行业动态 1.仓储行业以微薄的利润和成本敏感竞争为特点，导致在技术采纳方面采取谨慎态度。 仓储业主要被视为成本中心，是一个低利润率、高波动性和风险的行业。基于成本的、风险规避的竞争动态促使仓库运营商尽可能降低成本敞口。这是该行业迟缓采用新技术的一个主要原因。 随着无人化、自动化等热门技术的发展，我们可以预期仓库运营商将在未来更加倾向于采用这些先进技术来提高运营效率和降低成本。这些技术的应用不仅局限于无人搬运车、机器人拣选系统等，还包括智能仓库管理系统、大数据分析和云计算等。这些技术将为仓库管理带来更高的智能化水平，同时也会改变传统的仓储岗位和职责。
另一喜欢自我拓展的模型翻译：
贝丝·古特利斯和尼克·西奥多 2019年10月22日 “黑暗”的仓库即将出现，会在没有人类的情况下运作吗？有关技术采用和自动化导致大规模失业的预测经常将仓储业作为一个处于转型边缘的行业。许多蓝领工作岗位的潜在消失是政策制定者面临的紧迫问题，并引发了有关工人在未来经济中的状况的重要问题。 与仅关注可能会失去的工作数量的报告相比，我们的研究提供了对仓储工作和整个行业如何随着新技术采用在未来五到十年内可能发生变化的全面，详细的了解。本报告的发现基于深入的行业研究和广泛的访谈，包括行业分析师和顾问、第三方物流(3PL)运营商、零售商、品牌和技术提供商等广泛的利益相关者。具体而言，我们想了解以下问题： 什么关键行业动态在技术变革中扮演着重要角色？ 新技术的采用将如何影响仓库设施和运营，以及整个行业的组织？ 哪些任务和流程是技术应用的最高优先级，新技术的采用将如何影响仓储业中的工作？ 许多关于技术变革的报道将企业的决策视为纯粹基于希望自动化以降低劳动力成本。虽然劳动力成本的降低起到了重要的作用，但我们的研究发现了一系列塑造企业如何在仓库应用新技术的因素。一组趋势——紧缩的劳动力市场、不断上升的房地产成本和不断加快的速度要求——正在推动仓库运营商探索新技术。 另一方面，不确定性、外包动态、惯性和技术创新状况是可能减缓技术采用过程的因素。 因此，我们预计在未来十年内，该行业不太可能经历大规模的失业，尽管随着技术针对特定任务的采用，许多工人可能会看到他们的工作内容和质量发生变化。雇主可能会利用技术降低工作的技能要求，以减少培训时间和降低人员流动成本。这可能会对工人产生不利影响，例如工资停滞和工作不安全。新技术有可能减轻单调或体力劳动，但取决于它们的实施方式，可能会对工人的健康和安全、员工士气和人员流动性产生新的挑战。此外，电子化的监控和微观管理形式有可能限制工人的自主权，并在工作场所引入新的僵化。 这些变化将对高度集中仓储工人的社区产生更大的影响。仓库通常集中在主要交通动脉和人口中心附近，例如加州内陆帝国和芝加哥地区。三分之二的前线仓储工人是有色人种，其中大部分是黑人或拉丁裔，他们可能会因技术变革而受到不成比例的影响。女性更有可能在不断增长的电子商务行业工作，而不是在传统的仓库工作中，因此她们可能会从不断增长的就业机会中受益，但也面临着工资较低和工作条件变化的不断加剧的压力。 发现 技术遇到变化的行业动态 1.仓储业的特点是利润率较低、竞争力量敏感，导致在技术采用方面采取谨慎态度。 由于被视为成本中心，仓储是一种利润率较低、波动性和风险较高的行业。基于成本和风险厌恶的竞争力量使得仓库运营商尽可能减少成本。这是该行业追赶新技术采用的主要原因之一。
这家伙很懒，还没有设置简介
